Loading...
2020-24RESOLUTION NO. 2020-24 COUNCIL MEMBER ANDERSEN INTRODUCED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION: RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BLAIR, NEBRASKA, RESCINDING A PORTION OF THE AREAS IN THE CITY PREVIOUSLY DESIGNATED AS BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD, AND DIRECTING THAT THE BLAIR CORE AREA AND SOUTH HIGHWAY 30 AREA IN THE BLIGHT AND SUBSTANDARD STUDY FOR BLAIR, NEBRASKA, PREPARED BY JEO CONSULTING GROUP, 2020, AND AS DESCRIBED IN THIS RESOLUTION, BE DECLARED AS BLIGHTED AND SUBSTANDARD AND IN NEED OF REDEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO THE NEBRASKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT LAW. WHEREAS, it is desirable and in the public interest that the City of Blair, Nebraska (the "City"), a municipal corporation and city of first class, undertake and carry out urban redevelopment projects in areas of the City which are determined to be blighted and substandard and in need of redevelopment; and WHEREAS, Chapter 18, Article 21, Nebraska Reissue Revised Statutes, as amended, known as the Community Development Law (the "Act"), prescribes the requirements and procedures for the planning and implementation of urban redevelopment projects; and WHEREAS, the City, in accordance with the laws of the State of Nebraska applicable to cities of the first class, has duly prepared and approved a general plan for the development of the City known as its Comprehensive Plan, all as required by section 18-2110 of the Act; and WHEREAS, section 18-2109 of the Act requires that, prior to the City preparing a redevelopment plan for a redevelopment project, the Council as governing body of the City, should, by resolution, find and determine that the area is a blighted and substandard area and in need of redevelopment as defined in the Act; and WHEREAS, there currently exists areas of the City that the Council previously designated as blighted and substandard; and WHEREAS, in the interest of the changing needs and growth of the City, it is desirable to redefine the boundaries of such blighted and substandard areas via rescinding a portion of such blighted and substandard areas and designating newly defined areas as blighted and substandard; and WHEREAS, in an effort to achieve the foregoing, the City received a blight and substandard study from JEO Consulting Group recommending that two portions of the City qualify for declaration by the City as a blighted and substandard area in need of redevelopment as defined in the Act (the "Blight Study"), which Blight Study is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, such portions of the City that are recommended by the Blight Study for a blight and substandard designation are referred to in the Blight Study and herein as the "Blair Core Area" and the "South Highway 30 Area" (collectively, the "Study Areas"), respectively; and WHEREAS, the legal descriptions for the Blair Core Area and South Highway 30 Area are attached hereto as Exhibit 2 and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council submitted the question of whether the Study Areas are blighted and substandard and in need of redevelopment to the Planning Commission of the City for its review and recommendation, and on July 7, 2020, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the question and recommended to the Mayor and Council that the area be designated blighted and substandard and in need of redevelopment; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the Planning Commission's July 7, 2020 hearing, it was discovered that a portion of the South Highway 30 Area that was intended to be included within the blight and substandard designation was omitted from the Blight Study; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the Planning Commission's July 7, 2020 hearing but prior to the Council's July 14, 2020 hearing, the Blight Study was amended to include such omitted area of the South Highway 30 Area, and the Council will consider such amended Blight Study, which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1, while giving consideration to the fact that the Blight Study changed subsequent to the Planning Commission's recommendation thereof; and WHEREAS, on Tuesday, July 14, 2020, at 7:00 P.M., the Mayor and Council of the City held a public hearing to determine whether the Study Areas should be declared blighted and substandard and in need of redevelopment as required by the Act; and WHEREAS, notice of the Public Hearing was published in the Enterprise, a legal newspaper of general circulation in the City, and mailed to all required recipients, in compliance with the Act; and WHEREAS, the Council conducted the July 14, 2020 public hearing pursuant to the Nebraska Open Meetings Act and afforded all interested parties a reasonable opportunity to express their views respecting the declaration of the Blair Core Area and South Highway 30 Area as blighted and substandard and in need of redevelopment, and the Mayor and Council reviewed and discussed the Blight Study. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BLAIR, NEBRASKA: Section 1. The Mayor and Council find, based on substantial evidence in the Blight Study and in the record of this proceeding and the July 14, 2020 Public Hearing that the Blair Core Area and South Highway 30 Area qualify as blighted, substandard and in need of redevelopment due to, among other things, their overall structural condition, faulty lot layout, unsanitary or unsafe conditions, deterioration, diversity of site ownership, obsolete platting, existence of conditions endangering life and property, detrimental effect on public health and safety, exterior condition of 2 structures, age of structures, inadequate ventilation and sanitation, and other substandard conditions. Section 2. Based on the foregoing, the Blight Study and substantial evidence in the record of this proceeding, the Mayor and Council hereby declare the Blair Core Area and South Highway 30 Area as blighted and substandard and in need of redevelopment pursuant to the Act, in that conditions now exist in the Blair Core Area and South Highway 30 Area meeting the criteria in section 18-2103(31) of the Act. Section 3. The Blair Core Area and South Highway 30 Area are hereby further declared to be blighted and in need of redevelopment pursuant to the Act, in that conditions now exist in the Blair Core Area and South Highway 30 Area meeting the criteria set forth in the Act, including, without limitation, (a) one or more of the factors set forth in section 18-2103(3)(a) of the Act and (b) at least one of the factors set forth in section 18-2103(3)(b) of the Act, as described and set forth in the Blight Study. Section 4. The blighted and substandard conditions existing in the Blair Core Area and South Highway 30 Area are beyond remedy and control solely through the regulatory process and the exercise of police power and cannot be dealt with effectively by the ordinary operations of private enterprise without the aids provided by the Act, and the elimination of the blighted and substandard conditions by redevelopment under the authority of the Act is hereby found to be a public purpose and declared to be in the public interest. Section 5. The Blair Core Area and South Highway 30 Area are in need of redevelopment and is or will be an eligible site for a redevelopment project under the provisions of the Act at the time of the adoption of any redevelopment plan with respect thereto. Section 6. To facilitate the designation of the Blair Core Area and South Highway 30 Area as blighted and substandard, and in conformance with the requirement that a city of the first class may designate no more than 35% of its total land area as blighted and substandard under the Act, all prior blight and substandard designations in the City, excluding the blight and substandard designation for the "Transformation Hill Redevelopment Area", designated by the Council pursuant to Resolution 2018-13, are hereby terminated, rescinded and superseded by the designation of the Blair Core Area and South Highway 30 Area, as provided in this Resolution and the Blight Study. Section 7. This Resolution shall be published and shall take effect as provided by law. COUNCIL MEMBER ANDERSEN MOVED THAT THE RESOLUTION BE ADOPTED AS READ, WHICH SAID MOTION WAS SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER SHEPARD. UPON ROLL CALL, COUNCIL MEMBERS JENSEN, HALL, ANDERSEN, WOLFF, RUMP, SHEPARD AND STEWART VOTING "AYE" AND COUNCIL MEMBERS NONE VOTING `NAY", THE MAYOR DECLARED THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION PASSED AND APPROVED THIS 14TH DAY OF JULY 2020. CITY OF BLAIR, NEBRASKA BY: V RICHARD FIANSEN, MAYOR ATTEST: ) :ss: WASHINGTON COUNTY ) BRENDA WHEELER, hereby certifies that she is the duly appointed, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Blair, Nebraska, and that the above and foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Mayor and City Council of said City held on the 14th day of July 2020, YAC w L, "/)- BRENDA WHEELER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: SPECIAL CITY ATTORNEY 4 EXHIBIT 1 Blight Study [Blight Study attached] Blight and Substandard Study City of Blair, Nebraska 2020 Blair Core Area and South Highway 30 Area JEO Consulting Group, Inc. Project No. 131365.00 Adopted July 14, 2020 Adopted __________ , 2014 Resolution No. __________ Resolution 2020 - 24 Introduction Introduction Purpose of the Study This Blair Blight and Substandard Study of the Designated Study Area is intended to give the Community Development Agency and City Council the basis for determining the existence of blight and substandard conditions within the delineated Study Area. Through this process, the CDA may employ and exercise the power authorized in Nebraska Community Development Law to eliminate economic and/or social concerns which are detrimental to the future public health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the entire community as well as the surrounding region. The findings of this Study will guide the general redevelopment for the designated Area. The General Redevelopment Plan – the companion document to the Blight and Substandard Study - will contain local objectives regarding appropriate land uses, improved traffic circulation, economic development activities, public transportation, public utilities, and other public improvements, in accordance with the provisions of the Nebraska Community Development Law. The proposed requirements in the redevelopment area shall include without being limited to: The boundaries of the redevelopment project area, with a map showing the existing uses and condition  of the real property therein, A land-use plan showing proposed uses of the area,  Information showing the standards of population densities, land coverage, and building intensities in  the area after redevelopment, A statement of the proposed changes, if any, in zoning ordinances or maps, street layouts, street levels  or grades, or building codes and ordinances, A site plan of the area, and  A statement as to the kind and number of additional public facilities or utilities which will be required  to support the new land uses in the area after redevelopment. Background In 1975, the Nebraska Unicameral enacted legislation in response to the existence of area in cities and villages that had become deteriorated and substandard for a variety of reasons. These areas were considered harmful to the social and economic well-being of the entire community in which they existed. Conditions in such area were considered beyond the remedy and control of the normal regulatory process or impossible to reverse through the ordinary operations of private enterprise. The Community Development Law, as it is known, enables cities and villages to take steps to eliminate blight through the acquisition, clearance, and disposition of property for redevelopment or the conservation and rehabilitation of the property. Prior to the enactment of the legislation, Nebraska communities were unable to carry out redevelopment programs involving assembly of land for conveyance to private developers without the creation of an urban renewal authority approved by the voters of the municipality. The Nebraska Community Development Law (Neb. Rev. Stat. § 18-2101 to 18-2144) permits cities of all classes and villages to establish Community Development Agencies (CDAs) by ordinance. Such authority empowers CDAs to undertake broad urban renewal and municipal growth opportunities through a variety of mechanisms. This law, with subsequent amendments, has been the cornerstone of redevelopment and community development activities in Nebraska. This Blair Blight and Substandard Study examines existing conditions of land-use, buildings, and structures within the Designated Study Area in the City of Blair to determine its eligibility for redevelopment activities. The area for this analysis is the Designated Study Area which is an area generally described as the former Dana College Campus except the football field and adjacent facilities. A number of potential opportunities for redevelopment exist throughout the Proposed Study Area, which would allow the City of Blair to overcome blighted and substandard conditions. When evaluating blight and substandard conditions, the City of Blair must adhere to Nebraska Community Development Law, as provided for in the Nebraska Revised Statutes. City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 1 Introduction Nebraska Revised State Statutes Nebraska’s Community Development Law (Neb Rev Stat §§18-2101 to 18-2154) provides guidelines under which municipalities may address concerns and develop strategies for the rehabilitation and redevelopment of deteriorating area, as well as the prevention and elimination of substandard and blighted area. The Legislature has declared, in pertinent part: It is hereby found and declared that there exist in cities of all classes and villages of this state area which have deteriorated and become substandard and blighted because of the unsafe, insanitary, inadequate, or overcrowded condition of the dwellings therein, or because of inadequate planning of the area, or excessive land coverage by the buildings thereon, or the lack of proper light and air and open space, or because of the defective design and arrangement of the buildings thereon, or faulty street or lot layout, or congested traffic conditions, or economically or socially undesirable land uses…These conditions are beyond remedy and control solely by regulatory process in the exercise of the police power and cannot be dealt with effectively by the ordinary operations of private enterprise without the aids herein provided…It is further found and declared that the prevention and elimination of blight is a matter of state policy, public interest, and statewide concern and within the powers and authority inhering in and reserved to the state, in order that the state and its municipalities shall not continue to be endangered by area which are focal centers of disease, promote juvenile delinquency, and consume an excessive proportion of their revenue. §18-2102 Consistent with these findings, municipalities have been granted the power to address deterioration, substandard conditions, and blight through any of a number of means, including “the formulation of a workable program, the approval of community redevelopment plans consistent with the general plan for the development of the city, the exercise of its zoning powers, the enforcement of other laws, codes, and regulations, relating to the use of land and the use and occupancy of buildings and improvements, the disposition of any property acquired, and the providing of necessary public improvements.” Neb. Rev. Stat. §18-2104. Nebraska Revised Statutes §18-2104 enables a municipality to declare that blight and substandard conditions exist. The statute reads, The governing body of a city, to the greatest extent it deems to be feasible in carrying out the provisions of sections 18-2101 to 18-2144, shall afford maximum opportunity, consistent with sound needs of the city as a whole, to the rehabilitation or redevelopment of the community redevelopment area by private enterprises. The governing body of a city shall give consideration to this objective in exercising its powers under sections 18-2101 to 18-2144, including the formulation of a workable program, the approval of community redevelopment plans consistent with the general plan for the development of the city, the exercise of its zoning powers, the enforcement of other laws, codes, and regulations relating to the use and occupancy of buildings and improvements, the disposition of any property acquired, and providing of necessary public improvements. §18-2101 The process of improving an area begins with the creation of a municipality-wide workable program for utilizing appropriate private and public resources to address the specific conditions to be improved. Such workable programs may include “provision for the prevention of the spread of blight into area of the municipality which are free from blight through diligent enforcement of housing, zoning, and occupancy controls and standards; the rehabilitation or conservation of substandard and blighted area or portions thereof by re-planning, removing congestion, providing parks, playgrounds, and other public improvements by encouraging voluntary rehabilitation and by compelling the repair and rehabilitation of deteriorated or deteriorating structures; and the clearance and redevelopment of substandard and blighted area or portions thereof.” Neb. Rev. Stat. §18-2105. The statutes provide a means for the governing body of a municipality to address and develop strategies for rehabilitation and redevelopment of the community. Nebraska Revised Statutes §18-2105 also grants authority to the governing body to formulate a redevelopment program. The statute reads, City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 2 Introduction The governing body of a city or an authority at its direction for the purposes of sections 18-2101 to 18- 2144 may formulate for the entire municipality a workable program for utilizing appropriate private and public resources to eliminate or prevent the development or spread of urban blight, to encourage needed urban rehabilitation, to provide for the redevelopment of substandard and blighted area, or to undertake such of the aforesaid activities or other feasible municipal activities as may be suitably employed to achieve the objectives of such workable program. Such workable program may include, without limitation, provision for the prevention of the spread of blight into area of the municipality which are free from blight through diligent enforcement of housing, zoning and occupancy controls and standards; the rehabilitation or conservation of substandard or blighted area or portions thereof by replanning, removing congestion, providing parks, playgrounds, and other public improvements by encouraging voluntary rehabilitation and by compelling the repair and rehabilitation of deteriorated or deteriorating structures; and the clearance and redevelopment of substandard and blighted area or portions thereof. §18-2105 The main substance of a workable program is an adopted general redevelopment plan for a defined area, as well as the subsequent individual redevelopment projects that identify specific projects within a redevelopment area. Prior to the adoption of a general redevelopment plan, a municipality must have adopted comprehensive plan (§18-2110), and shall have declared the redevelopment area to be a substandard and blighted area in need of redevelopment (§18-2109). The important community development terms are defined in Nebraska Revised Statutes §18-2103, several of which are shown below (organization and emphasis added): Substandard area means an area in which there is a predominance of buildings or improvements, whether nonresidential or residential in character, which, by reason of dilapidation, deterioration, age or obsolescence, inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air, sanitation, or open spaces, high density of population and overcrowding, or the existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes, or any combination of such factors, is conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency, and crime, (which cannot be remedied through construction of prisons), and is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare; Blighted area means an area, which (a) by reason of the presence of a substantial number of deteriorated or deteriorating structures, existence of defective or inadequate street layout, faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness, insanitary or unsafe conditions, deterioration of site or other improvements, diversity of ownership, tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land, defective or unusual conditions of title, improper subdivision or obsolete platting, or the existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes, or any combination of such factors, substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the community, retards the provision of housing accommodations, or constitutes an economic or social liability and is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use; and, (b) in which there is at least one of the following conditions: (i) Unemployment in the designated area is at least one hundred twenty percent of the state or national average; (ii) the average age of the residential or commercial units in the area is at least forty years; (iii) more than half of the plotted and subdivided property in an area is unimproved land that has been within the city for forty years and has remained unimproved during that time; City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 3 Introduction (iv) the per capita income of the area is lower than the average per capita income of the city or village in which the area is designated; or (v) the area has had either stable or decreasing population based on the last two decennial censuses. In no event shall a city of the metropolitan, primary, or first class designate more than thirty- five percent of the city as blighted, a city of the second class shall not designate an area larger than fifty percent of the city as blighted, and a village shall not designate an area larger than one hundred percent of the village as blighted; Redevelopment project means any work or undertaking in one or more community redevelopment area: (a) To acquire substandard and blighted area or portions thereof, including lands, structures, or improvements the acquisition of which is necessary or incidental to the proper clearance, development, or redevelopment of such substandard and blighted area; (b) to clear any such area by demolition or removal of existing buildings, structures, streets, utilities, or other improvements thereon and to install, construct, or reconstruct streets, utilities, parks, playgrounds, public spaces, public parking facilities, sidewalks or moving sidewalks, convention and civic centers, bus stop shelters, lighting, benches or other similar furniture, trash receptacles, shelters, skywalks and pedestrian and vehicular overpasses and underpasses, and any other necessary public improvements essential to the preparation of sites for uses in accordance with a redevelopment plan; (c) to sell, lease, or otherwise make available land in such area for residential, recreational, commercial, industrial, or other uses, including parking or other facilities functionally related or subordinate to such uses, or for public use or to retain such land for public use, in accordance with a redevelopment plan; and may also include the preparation of the redevelopment plan, the planning, survey, and other work incident to a redevelopment project and the preparation of all plans and arrangements for carrying out a redevelopment project; (d) to dispose of all real and personal property or any interest in such property, or assets, cash, or other funds held or used in connection with residential, recreational, commercial, industrial, or other uses, including parking or other facilities functionally related or subordinate to such uses, or any public use specified in a redevelopment plan or project, except that such disposition shall be at its fair value for uses in accordance with the redevelopment plan; (e) to acquire real property in a community redevelopment area which, under the redevelopment plan, is to be repaired or rehabilitated for dwelling use or related facilities, repair or rehabilitate the structures, and resell the property; and (f) to carry out plans for a program of voluntary or compulsory repair and rehabilitation of buildings or other improvements in accordance with the redevelopment plan; Redevelopment plan means a plan, as it exists from time to time for one or more community redevelopment area, or for a redevelopment project, which (a) conforms to the general plan for the municipality as a whole and (b) is sufficiently complete to indicate such land acquisition, demolition and removal of structures, redevelopment, improvements, and rehabilitation as may be proposed to be carried out in the community redevelopment area, zoning and planning changes, if any, land uses, maximum densities, and building requirements. City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 4 Eligibility Analysis Substandard and Blight Eligibility Analysis Blair Designated Study Area The City of Blair selected the Designated Study Area to be a portion of the community previously designated as Blighted and Substandard except for the Transformation Hill Addition, aka former Dana College Campus, and portions previously unstudied for evaluation pursuant to Neb Rev Stat §18-2101 to 18-2154. The area is within the corporate limits. The Designated Study Area was selected for a number of reasons, including: 1. The potential for private development and redevelopment activities within the Study Area. 2. The need for improvements in infrastructure due to specific existing conditions. 3. The economical and functional obsolescence of certain uses within the Study Area. 4. The presence of Blighted and Substandard characteristics within the Study Area. 5. The need for public intervention to stimulate the development and redevelopment of vital infrastructure systems to support these private redevelopment efforts. Once declared substandard and blighted, the City of Blair can stimulate and manage future development in this Area by creation and use of the redevelopment plan and its statutory authority to provide financial incentives for private development. Through the redevelopment process, the City of Blair can guide future development in the community and provide financial incentives for development. The use of the Nebraska Community Development Law by the City is intended to improve the community and enhance the quality of life for all residents by eliminating conditions that contribute to the spread of blight and retard private reinvestment in the area due to these factors. Using the provisions under this state statute, Blair can eliminate negative factors and implement programs and/or projects identified to improve conditions, thereby removing blight and substandard conditions. Substandard and Blight Conditions As set forth in Section 18-2103 (10) Neb. Rev. Stat. (reissue 1997, as amended), substandard area shall mean an area in which there is a predominance of buildings or improvements, whether nonresidential or residential in character, which by reason of the following: 1. Dilapidation/deterioration* Exterior inspection of buildings to note deficiencies (sound, minor, major, dilapidated) Examples include structural (walls, foundation, roof), building systems (gutters, roof  surface, chimney), and architectural systems (fire escapes, weatherization, steps, exterior paint, site conditions). 2. Age or obsolescence Estimate age of structures (40+ years criteria) 3. Inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air, sanitation, or open spaces Overall sight conditions Examples include junked cars or debris, cluttered alleyways, antiquated infrastructure  systems (overhead power lines), outdoor storage/sanitation facilities, unpaved parking/outdoor storage. 4. Other Substandard Conditions (a) High density of population and overcrowding (census); or (b) The existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other causes as unsanitary and unsafe conditions which endanger life or property by fire and other natural causes floodplain; or City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 5 Eligibility Analysis (c) Any combination of such factors is conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency, and crime; is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare (includes sanitation concerns, inadequate infrastructure systems (sewer, water service mains, storm sewers), poor lighting, crime statistics, floodplain area, outdoor storage, site clutter). blighted area As set forth in the Nebraska legislation, a shall mean an area, which by reason of the presence of: 1. A substantial number of deteriorated or deteriorating structures* Exterior inspection of buildings to note deficiencies (sound, minor, major, dilapidated) Examples include structural (walls, foundation, roof), building systems (gutters, roof  surface, chimney), and architectural systems (fire escapes, weatherization, steps, exterior paint, site conditions). 2. Existence of defective or inadequate street layout Condition of streets/inadequate access Examples include street conditions, dead ends, railroad crossings, linear downtown, narrow  alleyways, and blind crossings. 3. Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness Conditions associated with accessibility/usefulness of the lots Examples include land locked parcels, odd shaped lots, undersized lots, lots with  accessibility concerns. 4. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions Conditions which pose a threat to public health and safety Examples include age and physical condition of structures, floodplain, lack of public  infrastructure systems, unsanitary conditions, ventilation concerns. 5. Deterioration of site or other improvements Field observation of age and condition of public utilities, debris and inadequate public improvements Examples include lack of off-street parking, storm drainage, junk cars, dilapidated  structures, debris, on-site storage, congested overhead power lines. 6. Diversity of ownership The total number of unduplicated owners Examples include the necessity of to acquire numerous lots is a hindrance to  redevelopment. However, land assemblage of larger proportions necessary for major developments, is more economically feasible and will attract financial support, as well as public patronage required to repay such financial support. Such assemblage is difficult without public intervention. 7. Tax or special assessment delinquency exceeding the fair value of the land Examination of public records to determine the status of taxation of properties Examples include delinquent taxes, real estate taxes, tax exempt.  8. Defective or unusual conditions of title Examine public records to determine any defective or unusual title defects Examples include improper filings, liens, defective titles, etc.  City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 6 Eligibility Analysis 9. Improper subdivision or obsolete platting Examine public records to determine improper subdivision and obsolete platting Examples include undersized lots, improper zoning, lot configuration, easement concerns,  never recorded vacated streets, accessibility concerns. 10. The existence of conditions which endanger life or property by fire or other causes Examine conditions which endanger life or property Examples include inadequate, undersized or inoperative public infrastructure systems,  floodplain, building materials, site access, on-site storage (cars), secluded area for pests and vermin to thrive, inadequate surface drainage, street/sidewalk conditions, etc. 11. Any combination of such factors, substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the community, retards the provision of housing accommodations or constitutes an economic or social liability Economic and/or socially undesirable land uses Examples include incompatible land uses, economic obsolescence, functional  obsolescence which relates to the property’s ability to compete in the market place. 12. Is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use; and in which there is at least one of the following conditions: (a) Unemployment in the designated blighted area is at least one hundred twenty percent of the state or national average (Census statistics); (b) The average age of the residential or commercial units in the area is at least 40 years (Field observation); (c) More than half of the plotted and subdivided property in the area is unimproved land that has been within the city for 40 years and has remained unimproved during that time (Public records); (d) The per capita income of the designated blighted area is lower than the average per capita income of the city or village in which the area is designated (Census); or (e) The area has had either stable or decreasing population based on the last two decennial censuses (Census). *Where structural conditions are evaluated, individual structures are rated in accordance with the following rating schedule as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: no problem, adequate condition, deteriorating condition, or dilapidated condition. The following descriptions define the rating schedule used to assess and evaluate building and structure conditions: No Problem No structural or aesthetic problems are visible. Adequate Condition Slight damage to porches, steps, roofs, etc. is present on the structure,  Slight wearing away of mortar between bricks, stones, or concrete blocks,  Small Cracks in walls or chimneys,  Cracked windows,  Lack of paint, and  Slight wear on steps, doors, and door and window frames.  Deteriorating Condition Holes, open Cracks, rotted, loose, or missing materials in parts of the foundation, walls, (up to one-  quarter of the wall), or roof (up to one-quarter of roof), Shaky, broken, or missing steps or railings,  City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 7 Eligibility Analysis Numerous missing and cracked window panes,  Some rotted or loose windows or doors (no longer wind- or water-proof),  Missing bricks or other masonry of chimney, and  Makeshift (un-insulated) chimney.  Dilapidated Condition Holes, open Cracks, or rotted, loose or missing material (siding, shingles, brick, concrete, tiles, plaster,  floorboards) over large area of foundation, on walls or on roof, Substantial sagging of roof, floors, or walls,  Extensive damage by fire, flood or storm, and  Inadequate original construction such as makeshift walls, roofs made of scrap materials, foundations  or floors lacking, or converted barns, sheds, and other structures not adequate for housing. City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 8 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Designated Study Area The initial study area as identified in the contract between the City of Blair and JEO Consulting can be found Error! Reference source not found. in . For this study, the initial study area will be known as the “Designated Study Area” which was reviewed for Substandard and Blight characteristics. Study Focus Areas The area which can be declared Blighted and Substandard is limited to thirty-five percent of the city’s corporate limits for cities of the first class in Nebraska. Thus, the following two areas are the focus of this study based upon the characteristics identified in the preliminary field analysis. Figure 2 depicts these areas as: Blair Core Area and the South Highway 30 Area. Based upon the review of the Designated Study Area, and its context with the community, JEO Consulting recommends the two Focus Areas be the Proposed Blight and Substandard Areas, as shown in Figure 2. City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 9 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Figure 1 Study Area City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 10 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Figure 2 Focus Areas City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 11 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Proposed Blight Area: Blair Core Area The Proposed Blair Core Blight and Substandard Area consist of approximately 735.6 acres. The legal description that follows was drawn up and reviewed by a JEO registered surveyor. Adding this area of land increases the total declared blighted area for the City of Blair (Former Dana College Campus Area of 72.3 acres) to acres 807.9 of the total 3,548 acres within its Corporate Limits. Approval of the study by amending and restating the area declared Blighted and Substandard will bring the total percentage of the corporate limits designated to 22.8%. Legal Descriptions A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, AND THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 11, THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF, THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH EAST QUARTER, THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, ALL LOCATED IN TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE SIXTH P.M. IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, NEBRASKA, AND THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, ALL LOCATED IN TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 12 EAST OF THE SIXTH P.M. IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, NEBRASKA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TAX LOT 225 OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 225, A DISTANCE OF 334 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TAX LOT 185 OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 185, A DISTANCE OF 368 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST LINE OF TAX LOT 230 OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 94 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF UNITED STATES HIGHWAY 75; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ON SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1725 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WILBUR STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY, A DISTANCE OF 70 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF US HIGHWAY 75 AND THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WILBER STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1841 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTH STREET; THENCE EASTERLY ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1260 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTH 10TH STREET; THENCE EASTERLY ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1260 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTH 10TH STREET; THENCE EASTERLY, A DISTANCE OF 52 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID SOUTH 10TH STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 461 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COLFAX STREET; THENCE WESTERLY ON SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COLFAX STREET, A DISTANCE OF 450 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTH 11TH STREET; THENCE WESTERLY ON SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 880 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF US HIGHWAY 75; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 270 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LINCOLN STREET; THENCE WESTERLY ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 2675 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTH 19TH STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1035 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 12 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas THE INTERSECTION OF SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE SOUTHERLY RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD; THENCE WESTERLY ON SAID SOUTHERLY RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1851 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTHERLY RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH 23RD STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 331 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TAX LOT 589 OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE WESTERLY ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 589, A DISTANCE OF 474 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF TAX LOT 247 OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID EASTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTH CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 247; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 247, A DISTANCE OF 541 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 247; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, A DISTANCE OF 108 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TAX LOT 481 OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 481, A DISTANCE OF 214 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 481; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, A DISTANCE OF 113 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TAX LOT 471 OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 471, A DISTANCE OF 117 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 471; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 471, A DISTANCE OF 736 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FEERS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF BLAIR; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID FEERS ADDITION, A DISTANCE OF 303 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWESTCORNER OF CAUBLE CREEK ADDITION TO THE CITY OF BLAIR; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF CAUBLE CREEK ADDITION, A DISTANCE OF 195 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TAX LOT 430 OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 430, A DISTANCE OF 245 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF COLLEGE DRIVE; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 118 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH 24TH STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 950 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PARK STREET; THENCE EASTERLY ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 2124 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF US HIGHWAY 75; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 400 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NEBRASKA STREET; THENCE EASTERLY ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 880 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH 17TH STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 400 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PARK STREET; THENCE EASTERLY ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 440 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH 16TH STREET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, A DISTANCE OF 136 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TAX LOT 251 OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 251, A DISTANCE OF 136 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF NEBRASKA STREET; THENCE EASTERLY ON SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 2394 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH 10TH STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 532 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF IOWA STREET; THENCE WESTERLY ON SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1248 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TAX LOT 136 OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF TAX LOT 240, A DISTANCE OF 50 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TAX LOT 243 OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 243, A DISTANCE OF 194 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 243; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 243, A City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 13 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas DISTANCE OF 83 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF K-SPAN INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF BLAIR; THENCE EASTERLY ON SAID NORTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 823 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHERLY RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD; THENCE EASTERLY ON SAID NORTHERLY RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 339 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE EASTERLY ON SAID NORTHERLY RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 339 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1117 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF JACKSON STREET; THENCE EASTERLY ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1583 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WEST CORNER OF TAX LOT 155 OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE EASTERLY, A DISTANCE OF 137 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTH CORNER OF TAX LOT 120 OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE EASTERLY, A DISTANCE OF 443 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TAX LOT 93 OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF TAX LOT 257 OF SAID SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF 104 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 257; THENCE EASTERLY, A DISTANCE OF 409 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF US HIGHWAY 30; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ON SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 2994 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WEST BANK OF THE MISSOURI RIVER; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID WEST BANK, A DISTANCE OF 2108 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE CENTERLINE OF CAMERON DITCH; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ON SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 2029 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TAX LOT 296 OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 296, A DISTANCE OF 316 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF US HIGHWAY 30; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 3287 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTH 1ST STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1359 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TAX LOT 268 OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 268, A DISTANCE OF 493 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 268; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 268, A DISTANCE OF 117 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 268; THENCE WESTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 268, A DISTANCE OF 110 FEET, MORE OR LESS; THENCE NORTHERLY, A DISTANCE OF 71 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1 OF INDUSTRIAL POINT SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF BLAIR; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 735 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF EASTGATE PLAZA SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF BLAIR, A DISTANCE OF 249 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID EASTGATE PLAZA SUBDIVISION; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF EASTGATE PLAZA SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF BLAIR, A DISTANCE OF 249 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID EASTGATE PLAZA SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID EASTGATE PLAZA SUBDIVISION, A DISTANCE OF 403 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 OF SAID INDUSTRIAL POINT SUBDIVISION; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 73 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2, A DISTANCE OF 805 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TAX LOT 272 OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 272, A DISTANCE OF 264 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 272; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 272, A DISTANCE OF 332 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GRANT STREET; THENCE EASTERLY ON SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY, A DISTANCE OF 120 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TAX LOT 271 OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 271, A DISTANCE OF 1140 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 271; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 271, A DISTANCE OF 793 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 271; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 271, A DISTANCE OF 687 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ERIKSEN SUBDIVISION OF THE CITY OF BLAIR; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID ERIKSEN SUBDIVISION, A DISTANCE OF 315 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WETLANDS ROAD; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 14 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID ERIKSEN SUBDIVISION, A DISTANCE OF 315 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF WETLANDS ROAD; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ON SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 476 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GRANT STREETTHENCE EASTERLY ON SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 588 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INDUSTRIAL PARK DRIVE; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 181 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF JPR ADDITION TO THE CITY OF BLAIR; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID JPR ADDITION, A DISTANCE OF 905 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TAX LOT 169 OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 169, A DISTANCE OF 100 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TAX LOT 170 OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 170, A DISTANCE OF 290 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 170; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF TAX LOT 1 OF SAID SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF 28 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TAX LOT 267 OF SECTION 7; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 267, A DISTANCE OF 517 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 267; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 267, A DISTANCE OF 541 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 267; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 267, A DISTANCE OF 213 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 267; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 267, A DISTANCE OF 428 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF VACATED ADMIRAL STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID VACATED ADMIRAL STREET, A DISTANCE OF 26 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE CENTERLINE OF VACATED ADMIRAL STREET; THENCE WESTERLY ON THE SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 287 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTH 1ST STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 434 FEET, MORE OR LESS; THENCE WESTERLY, A DISTANCE OF 64 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TAX LOT 243 OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE WESTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 243, A DISTANCE OF 621 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 243; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 243, A DISTANCE OF 345 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 243; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 243, A DISTANCE OF 202 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF TAX LOT 219 OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE NORTHERLY ON SAID WESTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 24 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 219; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 243, A DISTANCE OF 418 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTH 1ST STREET; THENCE EASTERLY, A DISTANCE OF 66 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SOUTH 1ST STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 242 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 7; THENCE WESTERLY ON SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1373 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE WESTERLY ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 1956 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1856 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE WESTERLY ON SAID SOUTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1766 FEET, MORE OR LESS; THENCE SOUTHERLY, A DISTANCE OF 1424 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF TAX LOT 225 OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE EASTERLY ON SAID NORTHERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 83 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 225; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 225, A DISTANCE OF 354 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Figure 1: Proposed Blight Area City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 15 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Findings and Contributing Factors The intent of this Study is to determine whether the Proposed Blight Area within the community has experienced structural and site deterioration or if there are other negative factors which are decreasing the potential of development. The field survey conducted on February 26th-29th, 2020 indicated the focus study area has such deterioration throughout the Blair Core Focus Area. Thus, the study area warrants further examination with regard to blighted and substandard conditions. The following factors were evaluated to determine if there is a reasonable presence of blight and substandard conditions within the Focused Study Area. This section reviews the building and structure conditions, infrastructure, and land use found within the Proposed Blair Core Blight and Substandard Area based upon the statutory definitions, observations of the planning team during the field survey, and explains the identified contributing factors. Appendix A provides a visual description and documents examples of the different conditions described that led to the determination for each factor. City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 16 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas BLIGHTED CRITERIA CONDITIONS blighted area As set forth in the Nebraska legislation, a shall mean an area, which by reason of the presence of: Substantial Number of Deteriorated or Deteriorating Structures As a rule, the primary structure for each parcel within the Proposed Blight Area was examined. These totals include both residential and commercial buildings. There was a total of 465 primary structures evaluated. And 35% were evaluated as deteriorating or dilapidated. The buildings in the study area have substantial structural issues identified from an exterior visual observation Figure 2: Exterior Structural Conditions Dilapidated No Problem 2% 12% Deteriorating 33% Adequate 53% No ProblemAdequateDeterioratingDilapidated Defective or Inadequate Street Layout Street Conditions and Accessibility Street conditions and accessibility within the Proposed Blight Area were evaluated in relation to the provision of safe and efficient public circulation and access, and with regarded to ease of travel and appearance. Overall, the focus study area has adequate street grid to serve the area. The connectivity is disrupted by Highway 30 and the railroad corridors. As depicted in Figure 4, the street network generally received good and fair ratings, with a few exceptions. Thus, the street layout is considered adequate and not a contributing factor. City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 17 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Figure 3: Road Conditions City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 18 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness Conditions associated with accessibility/usefulness of lots Overall, the lot sizes vary throughout the Focus Blight and Substandard Area. A substantial portion of the area contains narrow commercial lots that do not meet current office and retail functionality with combining multiple lots. The majority of the lots were obsolete with mismatched dimensions, orientations, accessibility and multiple isolated or landlocked parcels with no street frontage. The focus area has substantial faulty lot layout and this specific characteristic is considered as a contributing factor. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions Conditions which pose a threat to public health and safety Lack of Sidewalks The majority of the area lacked sidewalks to allow for safe routs to schools, parks and other pedestrians. Age and physical condition of structures The age of structures and poor physical condition in older building stock pose a potential safety hazard to the general public. Building constructed prior to the 1970’s often contains lead-based paint, asbestos, and other potentially hazardous materials. Topography and terrain This study area has a variety of topography that drains to the low-lying water courses and the Missouri River in the far east. Flood Plain Portions of the focus area are in or adjacent to the designated floodplains which can endanger life and property during times of flooding. Onsite Storage and Debris There were numerous individual examples of onsite storage and debris noted during the evaluation. Examples include piles of old tire, inoperable vehicles, concrete and wood piles, and on-site storage. Theses can pose unsafe conditions by harboring vermin and rodents as well as holding water for mosquitoes breeding areas which can spread diseases to humans. Deterioration of site or other improvements On site improvements Examples of deteriorating on site improvements such as driveways, parking areas, and sidewalks were found throughout the focused study area. Onsite Storage and Debris There were numerous individual examples of onsite storage and debris noted during the evaluation. Examples include piles of old tire, inoperable vehicles, concrete and wood piles, and on-site storage. Theses can pose unsafe conditions by harboring vermin and rodents as well as holding water for mosquitoes breeding areas which can spread diseases to humans. Topography and terrain This study area has a variety of topography that drains to the low-lying water course in the southeastern portion of the area. Areas of washouts and erosion were observed throughout the area City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 19 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Figure 5 Sidewalks City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 20 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Figure 6: Potential Hazards City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 21 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Diversity of ownership Based upon the Washington County Tax Assessor’s data, there is a wide variety and diversity of ownership evident in the study area. Improper subdivision or obsolete platting Obsolete platting There are properties divided into different sizes, shapes, and lack road access. Overall, the lot sizes vary throughout the Focus Blight and Substandard Area. A substantial portion of the area contains narrow commercial lots that do not meet current office and retail functionality with combining multiple lots. The majority of the lots were obsolete with mismatched dimensions, orientations, accessibility and multiple isolated or landlocked parcels with no street frontage. Therefore, this area is subject to development which lacks consistency and connectivity. The existence of conditions which endanger life or property Onsite storage and debris There were seven individual examples of onsite storage and debris noted during the evaluation. Examples include construction materials, concrete and wood piles, and on-site storage. Onsite storage and debris are apparent within the Focus Blight and Substandard Area and present potential fire risks and harboring of vermin that can spread disease. These findings show can be a detriment to development in Blair and should be evaluated for removal Age and physical condition of structures The age of structures and poor physical condition in older building stock pose a potential safety hazard to the general public. Topography and terrain This study area has a variety of topography that drains to the low-lying water course in the southeastern portion of the area. Areas of washouts and erosion were observed throughout the area. Any combination of such factors, substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the community, retards the provision of housing accommodations or constitutes an economic or social liability. Economic and/or socially undesirable land uses Economic and Functional Obsolescence were not deemed to be a contributing factor in this study area. Is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use; and in which there is at least one of the following conditions: The Average Age of the Residential or Commercial Units in the Area is at Least 40 Years Structure Age Information regarding the age of the permanent structures within the Focus Study Area was provided by the Washington County Assessor’s Office and verified during the field survey. According to the data received, the average age of the commercial structures 67 years old. Because of these findings, the structure age of are considered to be a contributing factor to the blight and substandard conditions in the Proposed Blight and Substandard Area City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 22 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Figure 7: Age of Structure City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 23 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas SUBSTANDARD CRITERIA substandard area A shall mean an area in which there is a predominance of buildings or improvements, whether nonresidential or residential in character, which by reason of the following: Dilapidation/deterioration As part of the Blight and Substandard Study, a Structural Conditions Survey was completed along with an analysis of the land use patterns in the Focus Area. The condition of the structures was analyzed and rated according to the schedule as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (described in the Eligibility Analysis Section). See Appendix A for a visual description of the structures within the Study Area. There were 35% of the structures evaluated as deteriorating or dilapidated in the focus study area that have structural issues. Age or obsolescence Information regarding the age of the permanent structures within the Focus Study Area was provided by the Washington County Assessor’s Office and verified during the field survey. According to the data received, the average age of the commercial structures 67 years old. Because of these findings, the structure age of are considered to be a contributing factor to the blight and substandard conditions in the Proposed Blight and Substandard Area. Inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air, sanitation, or open spaces Onsite storage and debris There were seven individual examples of onsite storage and debris noted during the evaluation. Examples include construction materials, concrete and wood piles, and on-site storage. Onsite storage and debris are apparent within the Focus Blight and Substandard Area and present potential fire risks and harboring of vermin that can spread disease. These findings show can be a detriment to development in Blair and should be evaluated for removal Age and physical condition of structures The age of structures and poor physical condition in older building stock pose a potential safety hazard to the general public. Topography and terrain This study area has a variety of topography that drains to the low-lying water course in the southeastern portion of the area. Areas of washouts and erosion were observed throughout the area and a collapsed retaining wall Other Substandard Conditions The existence of conditions which endanger life or property The majority of conditions which endanger life and property are found within the abandoned and dilapidated buildings. In addition, debris pile, the age of the structures, open drainage and flood plain can all factor into conditions which endanger life and property. This can hinder the health and well-being of the owner and the public as well as endanger life and property. Onsite storage and debris There were seven individual examples of onsite storage and debris noted during the evaluation. Examples include construction materials, concrete and wood piles, and on-site storage. Age and physical condition of structures The age of structures and poor physical condition in older building stock pose a potential safety hazard to the general public. City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 24 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Any combination of such factors is conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency, and crime; is detrimental to the public health and safety There are many factors that can be detrimental to the public health. The dilapidated buildings, debris and onsite storage can create problems by establishing an environment for unwanted vagrancy, vermin and animals that can contribute to the transmission of disease. A total of 35% of the structures were evaluated as deteriorating or dilapidated. The poor structural condition can lead to buildings collapsing endangering the public safety. City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 25 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Figure9: Parcels Showing Blight and Substandard Conditions City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 26 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Blighted and Substandard Findings The Proposed Blair Core Blight Area has many items contributing to the Blight and Substandard Conditions. Based on the information collected and analyzed pursuant to Nebraska Revised State Statutes, the area has various items that were considered beyond the remedy and control of the normal regulatory process of the City of Blair or impossible to reverse through the ordinary operations of private enterprise. These conditions include: Table 1: Summary Matrix Criteria Structure Condition Yes Street Layout No Faulty Lot Layout Yes Unsanitary or Unsafe Conditions Yes Deterioration of Site Yes Diversity of Owners Yes Tax Special Assessment No Titles Conditions No Obsolete Platting Yes Endanger Life/Property Yes Any Combination Yes Detrimental to Public Health, Safety Yes BLIGHT TOTALS 9/12 Exterior Inspection of Structures Yes Age of Structures Yes Inadequate Provision for Ventilation, Sanitation Yes Other Substandard – (conducive to ill health, Yes floodplain, endanger life) 4/4 SUBSTANDARD TOTALS 13/16 TOTALS Conclusion A number of conditions within the Proposed Blair Core Blight Area were evaluated during the field survey which contributed to blighted and substandard conditions. The conditions showing evidence of blight are interspersed throughout the Proposed Blight Area, and as such the boundaries of the Proposed Blair Core Blight and Substandard Area are recommended for further action. It is the professional opinion of the consultant, based on the information collected and analyzed pursuant to Nebraska Revised State Statutes, that the Proposed Blight and Substandard Area is warranted a designation as blighted and substandard by the City of Blair and the Community Development Agency. The City of Blair should review this Blight and Substandard Study, and if satisfied with the findings contained in this Study, may, by resolution, designate the Proposed Blight Area as “Blighted and Substandard” as provided for in the Nebraska Community Law, making this Area available for redevelopment activities. The General Redevelopment Plan, when prepared, shall be developed in a manner consistent with the City of Blair Comprehensive Development Plan. City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 27 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Proposed Blight Area: South Highway 30 Area The Proposed South Highway 30 Blight and Substandard Area consist of approximately 341.7 acres. The legal description that follows was drawn up and reviewed by a JEO registered surveyor. Adding this area of land increases the total declared blighted area for the City of Blair (Former Dana College Campus Area of 72.3 acres and 735.6 acres for the Blair Core Area) to acres 1,149.6 of the total 3,548 acres within its Corporate Limits. Approval of the study by amending and restating the area declared Blighted and Substandard will bring the total percentage of the corporate limits designated to 32.4%. Legal Descriptions A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN WEST HALF OF THE EAST HALF, NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, AND THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, THE NORTHEAST OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, ALL LOCATED IN TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE SIXTH P.M. IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, NEBRASKA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE WESTERLY ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 2034 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TAX LOT 67 OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 67, A DISTANCE OF 62 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 67; THENCE WESTERLY ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 67 AND ITS EASTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF, A DISTANCE OF 635 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF GIBBS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF BLAIR; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID GIBBS ADDITION, A DISTANCE OF 700 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID GIBBS ADDITION; THENCE WESTERLY ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GIBBS ADDITION, A DISTANCE OF 924 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID GIBBS ADDITION; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID GIBBS ADDITION, A DISTANCE OF 660 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 1323 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 663 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 1319 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 558 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TAX LOT 162 OF SECTION 14; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 162, A DISTANCE OF 435 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 162; THENCE WESTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 162, A DISTANCE OF 309 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TAX LOT 163 OF SECTION 14; THENCE WESTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 163, A DISTANCE OF 190 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 163; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF TAX LOT 115 OF SECTION 14, A DISTANCE OF 470 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT 115; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID TAX LOT 115, A DISTANCE OF 313 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 6 OF RUSSEL’S ADDITION TO THE CITY OF BLAIR; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 6, A DISTANCE OF 846 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6; THENCE NORTHERLY, A DISTANCE OF 41 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF SAID RUSSEL’S ADDITION; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 15, A DISTANCE OF 806 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 15; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CLARK City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 28 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas STREET, A DISTANCE OF 976 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TAX LOT 209 OF SECTION 14; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, A DISTANCE OF 125 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TAX LOT 240 OF SECTION 14; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF US HIGHWAY 30, A DISTANCE OF 929 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 6 OF HUBERS ADDITION TO THE CITY OF BLAIR; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID HUBERS ADDITION, A DISTANCE OF 261 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 4 OF SAID HUBERS ADDITION; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 99 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTH CORNER OF LOT 3 OF SAID HUBERS ADDITION; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3, A DISTANCE OF 123 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE EASTERLY, A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 13 OF SAID HUBERS ADDITION; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 13, A DISTANCE OF 106 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 13, A DISTANCE OF 124 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 12 OF SAID HUBERS ADDITION; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 12, A DISTANCE OF 61 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EAST CORNER OF LOT 11 OF SAID HUBERS ADDITION; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 11, A DISTANCE OF 52 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 11; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, A DISTANCE OF 1979 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 1319 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTHERLY, A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1 OF HAYDEN PLACE REPLAT ONE TO THE CITY OF BLAIR; THENCE WESTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 513 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 680 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTHERLY, A DISTANCE OF 68 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ADMINISTRATIVE REPLAT OF HAYDTAEN PLACE REPLAT ONE LOTS 11 AND 12 TO THE CITY OF BLAIR; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID ADMINISTRATIVE REPLAT OF HAYDEN PLACE REPLAT ONE LOTS 11 AND 12, A DISTANCE OF 357 FEET, MORE OR LESS; THENCE EASTERLY, A DISTANCE OF 62 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 4 OF SAID HAYDEN PLACE REPLAT ONE; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 136 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 4, A DISTANCE OF 323 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 2 OF HAYDEN PLACE FIRST ADDITION REPLAT ONE TO THE CITY OF BLAIR, A DISTANCE OF 220 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 3 OF SAID HAYDEN PLACE FIRST ADDITION REPLAT ONE, A DISTANCE OF 155 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1 OF HAYDEN PLACE REPLAT ONE; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 195 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 679 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE NORTHERLY, A DISTANCE OF 60 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE EASTERLY ON SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1058 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 1295 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 1343 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AND ALSO INCLUDING, TAX LOT 138 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE SIXTH P.M. IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, NEBRASKA, AND ALSO INCLUDING, GUTSCHOW PLAZA ADDITION TO THE CITY OF BLAIR IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 18 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE SIXTH P.M. IN WASHINGTON COUNTY, NEBRASKA City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 29 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Findings and Contributing Factors The intent of this Study is to determine whether the Proposed South Highway 30 Blight Area within the community has experienced structural and site deterioration or if there are other negative factors which are decreasing the potential of development. The field survey conducted on February 26th-29th, 2020, indicated the focus study area has such deterioration throughout the Focus Area. Thus, the study area warrants further examination with regard to blighted and substandard conditions. The following factors were evaluated to determine if there is a reasonable presence of blight and substandard conditions within the Focused Study Area. This section reviews the building and structure conditions, infrastructure, and land use found within the Proposed South Highway 30 Blight and Substandard Area based upon the statutory definitions, observations of the planning team during the field survey, and explains the identified contributing factors. Appendix A provides a visual description and documents examples of the different conditions described that led to the determination for each factor. City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 30 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas BLIGHTED CRITERIA CONDITIONS blighted area As set forth in the Nebraska legislation, a shall mean an area, which by reason of the presence of: Substantial Number of Deteriorated or Deteriorating Structures As a rule, the primary structure for each parcel within the Proposed Blight Area was examined. These totals include both residential and commercial buildings. There was a total of 64 primary structures evaluated and 25% were evaluated as deteriorating or dilapidated. The buildings in the study area do not have structural issues significant enough to be considered as a contributing factor of the Blight and Substandard Characteristics Figure 10: Exterior Structural Conditions Dilapidated No Problem 0% 14% Deteriorating 25% Adequate 61% Defective or Inadequate Street Layout Street Conditions and Accessibility Street conditions and accessibility within the Proposed Blight Area were evaluated in relation to the provision of safe and efficient public circulation and access, and with regarded to ease of travel and appearance. Overall, the focus study area has an inadequate street grid to serve the area. The lack of connectivity is disrupted by Highway 30, a drainage channel and steep slopes. As depicted in Figure 11, the street network generally received good and fair ratings, with a few exceptions. Thus, the lack of connectivity of the street layout is considered inadequate and a contributing factor. City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 31 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Figure 11, Road Conditions City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 32 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Faulty lot layout in relation to size, adequacy, accessibility, or usefulness Conditions associated with accessibility/usefulness of lots Overall, the lot sizes vary throughout the Focus Blight and Substandard Area. A substantial portion of the area contains large commercial lots that are irregular in shape, lack access to adequate roads, or contain steep slopes that are not useful. The majority of the lots were obsolete with mismatched dimensions, orientations, accessibility and multiple isolated or landlocked parcels with no street frontage. The focus area has substantial faulty lot layout and this specific characteristic is considered as a contributing factor. Unsanitary or unsafe conditions Conditions which pose a threat to public health and safety Lack of Sidewalks The majority of the area lacked sidewalks except for the Highway 30 corridor, to allow for safe routs to schools, parks and other pedestrians. Age and physical condition of structures The age of structures and poor physical condition in older building stock pose a potential safety hazard to the general public. Building constructed prior to the 1970’s often contains lead-based paint, asbestos, and other potentially hazardous materials. Topography and terrain This study area has a variety of topography that drains to the low-lying water courses and steep slopes with evidence of erosion. Onsite Storage and Debris There were numerous individual examples of onsite storage and debris noted during the evaluation. Examples include piles of old tires, concrete and wood piles, and on-site storage. Theses can pose unsafe conditions by harboring vermin and rodents as well as holding water for mosquitoes breeding areas which can spread diseases to humans. Deterioration of site or other improvements On site improvements Examples of deteriorating on site improvements such as driveways, parking areas, and sidewalks were found throughout the focused study area. Onsite Storage and Debris There were numerous individual examples of onsite storage and debris noted during the evaluation. Examples include piles of old tire, concrete and wood piles, and on-site storage. Theses can pose unsafe conditions by harboring vermin and rodents as well as holding water for mosquitoes breeding areas which can spread diseases to humans. Topography and terrain This study area has a variety of topography that drains to the low-lying water course in the area. Areas of washouts and erosion were observed throughout the Focus Study Area. City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 33 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Figure 12 Sidewalks City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 34 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Figure 13: Potential Hazards City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 35 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Diversity of ownership Based upon the Washington County Tax Assessor’s data, there is a wide variety and diversity of ownership evident in the study area. Improper subdivision or obsolete platting Obsolete platting There are properties divided into different sizes, shapes, and lack road access. Overall, the lot sizes vary throughout the Focus Blight and Substandard Area. A substantial portion of the area contains large commercial lots that are irregular in shape and lack adequate access the majority of the lots were obsolete with mismatched dimensions, orientations, accessibility and multiple isolated or landlocked parcels with no street frontage. Therefore, this area is subject to development which lacks consistency and connectivity. The existence of conditions which endanger life or property Onsite storage and debris There are several examples of onsite storage and debris noted during the evaluation. Examples include construction materials, concrete and wood piles, and on-site storage. Onsite storage and debris are apparent within the Focus Blight and Substandard Area and present potential fire risks and harboring of vermin that can spread disease. These findings show can be a detriment to development in Blair and should be evaluated for removal Age and physical condition of structures The age of structures and poor physical condition in older building stock pose a potential safety hazard to the general public. Building constructed prior to the 1970’s often contains lead-based paint, asbestos, and other potentially hazardous materials. Topography and terrain This study area has a variety of topography that drains to the low-lying water course in the area. Areas of washouts and erosion were observed throughout the area. Any combination of such factors, substantially impairs or arrests the sound growth of the community, retards the provision of housing accommodations or constitutes an economic or social liability. Economic and/or socially undesirable land uses Portions of the area conation commercial lots with steep slopes that can be undesirable or create an economically undesirable lot. The condition is limited. Thus, the Economic and Functional Obsolescence were not deemed to be a contributing factor in this study area. City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 36 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Figure 14: Age of Structure City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 37 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals, or welfare in its present condition and use; and in which there is at least one of the following conditions: The Average Age of the Residential or Commercial Units in the Area is at Least 40 Years Structure Age Information regarding the age of the permanent structures within the Focus Study Area was provided by the Washington County Assessor’s Office and verified during the field survey. According to the data received, the average age of the residential structures 70 years old. Because of these findings, the structure age of the area is considered to be a contributing factor to the blight and substandard conditions in the Proposed Blight and Substandard Area. City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 38 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas SUBSTANDARD CRITERIA substandard area A shall mean an area in which there is a predominance of buildings or improvements, whether nonresidential or residential in character, which by reason of the following: Dilapidation/deterioration As part of the Blight and Substandard Study, a Structural Conditions Survey was completed along with an analysis of the land use patterns in the Focus Area. The condition of the structures was analyzed and rated according to the schedule as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (described in the Eligibility Analysis Section). See Appendix A for a visual description of the structures within the Study Area. There were 25% of the structures evaluated as deteriorating or dilapidated in the focus study area that have structural issues. Age or obsolescence Information regarding the age of the permanent structures within the Focus Study Area was provided by the Washington County Assessor’s Office and verified during the field survey. According to the data received, the average age of the residential structures 70 years old. Because of these findings, the structure age of are considered to be a contributing factor to the blight and substandard conditions in the Proposed Blight and Substandard Area. Inadequate provision for ventilation, light, air, sanitation, or open spaces Onsite storage and debris There are several individual examples of onsite storage and debris noted during the evaluation. Examples include construction materials, concrete and wood piles, and on-site storage. Onsite storage and debris are apparent within the Focus Blight and Substandard Area and present potential fire risks and harboring of vermin that can spread disease. These findings show can be a detriment to development in Blair and should be evaluated for removal Age and physical condition of structures The age of structures and poor physical condition in older building stock pose a potential safety hazard to the general public. Topography and terrain This study area has a variety of topography that drains to the low-lying water course in the southeastern portion of the area. Areas of washouts and erosion were observed throughout the area and a collapsed retaining wall Other Substandard Conditions The existence of conditions which endanger life or property The majority of conditions which endanger life and property are found within the abandoned and dilapidated buildings. In addition, debris piles, the age of the structures, open drainage and erosion can all factor into conditions which endanger life and property. This can hinder the health and well-being of the owner and the public as well as endanger life and property. Onsite storage and debris There were examples of onsite storage and debris noted during the evaluation. Examples include construction materials, concrete and wood piles, and on-site storage. City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 39 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Age and physical condition of structures The age of structures and poor physical condition in older building stock pose a potential safety hazard to the general public. Any combination of such factors is conducive to ill health, transmission of disease, infant mortality, juvenile delinquency, and crime; is detrimental to the public health and safety There are many factors that can be detrimental to the public health. The dilapidated buildings, debris and onsite storage can create problems by establishing an environment for unwanted vagrancy, vermin and animals that can contribute to the transmission of disease. A total of 25% of the structures were evaluated as deteriorating or dilapidated. The poor structural condition can lead to buildings collapsing endangering the public safety. City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 40 Designated Study Area & Proposed Blight Areas Figure15: Parcels Showing Blight and Substandard Conditions City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 41 Findings and Contributing Factors Blighted and Substandard Findings The Proposed South Highway 30 Blight Area has many items contributing to the Blight and Substandard Conditions. Based on the information collected and analyzed pursuant to Nebraska Revised State Statutes, the area has various items that were considered beyond the remedy and control of the normal regulatory process of the City of Blair or impossible to reverse through the ordinary operations of private enterprise. These conditions include: Table 2: Summary Matrix Criteria Structure Condition No Street Layout Yes Faulty Lot Layout Yes Unsanitary or Unsafe Conditions Yes Deterioration of Site Yes Diversity of Owners Yes Tax Special Assessment No Titles Conditions No Obsolete Platting Yes Endanger Life/Property Yes Any Combination Yes Detrimental to Public Health, Safety Yes BLIGHT TOTALS 9/12 Exterior Inspection of Structures No Age of Structures Yes Inadequate Provision for Ventilation, Sanitation Yes Other Substandard – (conducive to ill health, Yes floodplain, endanger life) 3/4 SUBSTANDARD TOTALS 12/16 TOTALS Conclusion A number of conditions within the Proposed Highway 30 Blight Area were evaluated during the field survey which contributed to blighted and substandard conditions. The conditions showing evidence of blight are interspersed throughout the Proposed Blight Area, and as such the boundaries of the Proposed South Highway 30 Blight and Substandard Area are recommended for further action. It is the professional opinion of the consultant, based on the information collected and analyzed pursuant to Nebraska Revised State Statutes, that the Proposed Blight and Substandard Area is warranted a designation as blighted and substandard by the City of Blair and the Community Development Agency. The City of Blair should review this Blight and Substandard Study, and if satisfied with the findings contained in this Study, may, by resolution, designate the Proposed Blight Area as “Blighted and Substandard” as provided for in the Nebraska Community Law, making this Area available for redevelopment activities. The General Redevelopment Plan, when prepared, shall be developed in a manner consistent with the City of Blair Comprehensive Development Plan. City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 42 Findings and Contributing Factors APPENDIX A PHOTO EXHIBIT City of Blair, Nebraska • Blight and Substandard Study • Core and South Hwy 30 Areas 43